We need the next generation to be innovative and imaginative, nonconformists who can come up with creative ways to solve the world’s problems. Comprehensive schools give young people an all-round education, not simply the ability to pass tests. We don’t need secondary moderns and the stigma of failure at 11.

If our international competitors think that the future is comprehensive, why shouldn’t we?

Grammar schools are a way of preventing a majority of children from going to a certain kind of school. These schools don’t help society to be fairer or better. Just the opposite: a grammar school system forces us all into being one-mark passes or failures at the age of 11 when in reality we’re all complex mixtures of abilities, strengths and weaknesses.

It is vital that comprehensive education is defended but also celebrated for the incredible advantages and benefits it brings to children’s lives and to society as a whole.

Selective schooling not only denies the fact that children learn at different rates, it deliberately sets out to deny the best education to some children, privileging others. If we want an equal society we MUST have an equal education system – everything starts with education.

We must break free from the belief that academic selection is any longer the way to transform the life chances of bright poor kids. This is a widespread
belief but we just have to recognise that there is overwhelming evidence that such academic selection entrenches advantage, it does not spread it.

Grammar schools are, truthfully, unambitious and outdated for our children and our country. Nearly all children, not just a privileged few, deserve and can master – with the right teaching and expectations – a rigorous, academic education. 

The evidence shows that grammar schools have a pernicious effect on poor pupils who don’t make it past the entrance exam. As a matter of principle, the state should not promote a system that brands pupils as winners and losers at such a young age.

Putting pressure on children at such a young age, and causing a divide between them and their peers has an immensely negative effect on children. No to the 11-plus. A good, fair and free education for all.

Comprehensive schools have one huge advantage. Their philosophy is that a fine education, a first-class education should be provided for all the children, because all children regardless of academic ability are equally important. Behind the comprehensive movement lies the core belief that all children should be given a fair chance in our society, that to grow up together creates greater cohesion and mutual understanding.

I think it is delusional to think that a policy of expanding the number of grammar schools is either a good idea, a sellable idea or even the right idea.